Current:Home > MyArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -Streamline Finance
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-16 18:58:10
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- For Palestinian and Israeli Americans, war has made the unimaginable a reality
- Maine police alerted weeks ago about threats from mass shooting suspect
- On the anniversary of a deadly Halloween crush, South Korean families demand a special investigation
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Court arguments begin in effort to bar Trump from presidential ballot under ‘insurrection’ clause
- Tennessee Titans players voice displeasure with fans for booing Malik Willis
- US consumers keep spending despite high prices and their own gloomy outlook. Can it last?
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Kaitlin Armstrong murder trial set to begin in slaying of professional cyclist
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Will Ariana Madix's Boyfriend Daniel Wai Appear on Vanderpump Rules? She Says...
- JAY-Z reflects on career milestones, and shares family stories during Book of HOV exhibit walkthrough
- Steelers QB Kenny Pickett ruled out of game vs. Jaguars after rib injury on hard hit
- FBI: California woman brought sword, whip and other weapons into Capitol during Jan. 6 riot
- 4 former Hong Kong student leaders jailed over their praise of a knife attack on a police officer
- These US cities will experience frigid temperatures this week
- Cornell University sends officers to Jewish center after violent, antisemitic messages posted online
Recommendation
Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
A cosplay model claims she stabbed her fiancé in self-defense; prosecutors say security cameras prove otherwise
Court arguments begin in effort to bar Trump from presidential ballot under ‘insurrection’ clause
A ‘whole way of life’ at risk as warming waters change Maine's lobster fishing
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
Court arguments begin in effort to bar Trump from presidential ballot under ‘insurrection’ clause
Israel opens new phase in war against Hamas, Netanyahu says, as Gaza ground operation expands
FIFA bans Luis Rubiales of Spain for 3 years for kiss and misconduct at Women’s World Cup final